<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Wikipedia is safe from Google Knol</title> <atom:link href="http://krishworld.com/open-source/open-media/wikipedia-is-safe-from-google-knol/%20/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://krishworld.com/open-source/open-media/wikipedia-is-safe-from-google-knol/</link> <description>imaging an open world</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:15:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Matthew Wittering &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I Knol that!</title><link>http://krishworld.com/open-source/open-media/wikipedia-is-safe-from-google-knol//comment-page-1#comment-214</link> <dc:creator>Matthew Wittering &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I Knol that!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:25:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krishworld.com/blog/open-source/open-media/wikipedia-is-safe-from-google-knol/#comment-214</guid> <description>[...] Kirsh at krishworld.com believes the Wikipedia format will prevail by using human intuition to organise all the information on one page will be more beneficial by preventing the replication of inaccurate facts and information across the internet. The Knol format would in fact have the risk of diluting Google search results through the replication of very similar information. It will also create a situation which makes the management of facts difficult. Read the blog in full at ‘Wikipedia is safe from Google’. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kirsh at krishworld.com believes the Wikipedia format will prevail by using human intuition to organise all the information on one page will be more beneficial by preventing the replication of inaccurate facts and information across the internet. The Knol format would in fact have the risk of diluting Google search results through the replication of very similar information. It will also create a situation which makes the management of facts difficult. Read the blog in full at ‘Wikipedia is safe from Google’. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob Ritchie</title><link>http://krishworld.com/open-source/open-media/wikipedia-is-safe-from-google-knol//comment-page-1#comment-213</link> <dc:creator>Bob Ritchie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:42:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krishworld.com/blog/open-source/open-media/wikipedia-is-safe-from-google-knol/#comment-213</guid> <description>Knol&#039;s obvious advantage is how it&#039;s served in SERPs, but it&#039;s going to take time for it to rach Wiki-like proportions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knol&#8217;s obvious advantage is how it&#8217;s served in SERPs, but it&#8217;s going to take time for it to rach Wiki-like proportions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Knol: la condivisione della conoscenza secondo Google</title><link>http://krishworld.com/open-source/open-media/wikipedia-is-safe-from-google-knol//comment-page-1#comment-212</link> <dc:creator>Knol: la condivisione della conoscenza secondo Google</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:39:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krishworld.com/blog/open-source/open-media/wikipedia-is-safe-from-google-knol/#comment-212</guid> <description>[...] hanno già iniziato a circolare le reazioni della Blogosfera, tra commenti entusiasti e blogger perplessi sulle possibilità di questo nuovo servizio. La prima cosa che viene in mente, infatti, è [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hanno già iniziato a circolare le reazioni della Blogosfera, tra commenti entusiasti e blogger perplessi sulle possibilità di questo nuovo servizio. La prima cosa che viene in mente, infatti, è [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Knol: battaglia sull&#8217;enciclopedia online</title><link>http://krishworld.com/open-source/open-media/wikipedia-is-safe-from-google-knol//comment-page-1#comment-211</link> <dc:creator>Jing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Knol: battaglia sull&#8217;enciclopedia online</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:34:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krishworld.com/blog/open-source/open-media/wikipedia-is-safe-from-google-knol/#comment-211</guid> <description>[...] hanno già iniziato a circolare le reazioni della Blogosfera, tra commenti entusiasti e blogger perplessi sulle possibilità di questo nuovo servizio. La prima cosa che viene in mente, infatti, è [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hanno già iniziato a circolare le reazioni della Blogosfera, tra commenti entusiasti e blogger perplessi sulle possibilità di questo nuovo servizio. La prima cosa che viene in mente, infatti, è [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via N/A

Served from: krishworld.com @ 2012-02-10 07:04:13 -->
